46 Comments
Jul 6, 2023Liked by Stephanie B. Natural

I read all of your posts (now 7/6/23)--just came to this flash from the past. How wise, how prescient you were. "I told you so" are bitter words to speak but you certainly were right. (FYI--never took the toxin, nor husband either).

Expand full comment

OK, so following your logic loops, please explain why my annual flu shots for the last two decades haven't spawned a superflu in my body. A lot of your commenters seem absolutely convinced that what they learned in junior high or online is more valid than any other available information. Basically, they are fully committed to the idea that all medical institutions are intentionally trying to kill them for profits. While I think capitalism is an evil system, it isn't quite THAT evil. We don't live in the Matrix and paranoia isn't good for mental health.

Expand full comment

no "virus" has ever been isolated...never...https://www.bitchute.com/video/rHmg8EY3cXPD/

Expand full comment

It’s interesting that you mention snake oil. Snake venom and its uses and abuses is woven into the Covid story in bizarre and coincidental ways. The pharma industry uses snake venom extensively in drug development. It is both a toxin and a source of medicine. I guess the dose makes the poison. Maybe the homeopaths are onto something.

Expand full comment

The bigger problem is not that the vax has risks, or birth control pills have risks. Pregnancy is also risky. Life is risky. Eventually it kills us all. The bigger problem is the people we hire to understand those risks, and to help us mitigate those risks -- the government -- have failed to do so. They have actively hidden those risks from us. They are suppressing the risk for corrupt purposes.

No one should trust the government, for anything, ever. They must be supervised constantly.

No one should trust the watch dogs we hire to monitor the government -- the media -- for anything, ever. Critical thinking must be applied to all information.

No one should trust doctors for anything, ever,. We hire them to give us medical advice and care, and they certainly recognized the government frauds, but did not intercede on our behalf. They can provide useful services, but must be managed carefully. They're like cars -- useful, but lethal if not carefully controlled.

The prosperity of modern society has made us complacent, and complacency has made us stupid and weak. Civilization cannot long endure on that basis. Few people are prepared to survive the end of civilization.

Expand full comment

do we use wounded war veterans to induct new troops? Right....and whoa.

Expand full comment

Planned obsolescence is a policy of planning or designing a product with an artificially limited useful life or a purposely frail design, so that it becomes obsolete after a certain pre-determined period of time upon which it decrementally functions or suddenly ceases to function, or might be perceived as unfashionable or ineffective.

The oft-purported origin of the phrase planned obsolescence goes back at least as far as 1932 with Bernard London's pamphlet Ending the Depression Through Planned Obsolescence. The essence of London's plan would have the government impose a legal obsolescence on personal-use items, to stimulate and perpetuate purchasing.

However, the phrase was reportedly more popularized in 1954 by Brooks Stevens, an American industrial designer. Stevens was due to give a talk at an advertising conference in Minneapolis in 1954. Without giving it much thought, he used the term as the title of his talk. From that point on, "planned obsolescence" became Stevens' catchphrase. By his definition, planned obsolescence was "Instilling in the buyer the desire to own something a little newer, a little better, a little sooner than is necessary."

Planned obsolescence has been used extensively & increasingly in a growing number of consumer products.

Especially by those mega-corporations, that largely lack true creativity & innovation, but must continually show increasing profits, in order to appease the largest Big Asset Management firms & Big Banks that exist as their largest shareholders.

In the U.S., where healthcare spending accounts for OVER 17.7 percent of GDP, the U.S. economy is becoming increasingly reliant on more & sicker people, in order to sustain economic activity & growth.

In a report published by Goldman Sachs in 2018, entitled The Genome Revolution, GS highlighted the "challenge for genome medicine developers looking for

sustained cash flow."

Further stating:

"We highlight several potential solutions for these genome medicine companies to

sustain an attractive profile." (i.e. sustained profits).

The World’s Largest Big Asset Management firms & Big Banks:

NAME: $AUM (assets under management):

BlackRock $9,464B

Vanguard $8,400B

UBS $4,432B

Fidelity $4,230

State Street $3,860

Morgan Stanley $3,274

JP Morgan $2,996

Allianz $2,953

The Capital Group $2,600

Goldman Sachs $2,372

Bank of New York Mellon $2,310

PIMCO $2,200

TOTAL AUM: OVER $49 TRILLION!

By just the 12 largest firms.

These Largest Big Asset Management firms & Big Banks operate like a true CARTEL.

Largely existing as the largest shareholders/investors of each other, in a highly-complex & extremely convoluted schema of cross-ownership.

Guess whom exists as the largest shareholders of Big Pharma?

And Big Med?

And Big Insurance?

In fact, These Largest Big Asset Management firms & Big Banks now exist as the largest owners of the largest "competing" corporations, in most every single industry.

Expand full comment
Jan 22, 2022Liked by Stephanie B. Natural

I thought I would re-visit the Great Barrington Declaration to see how the document holds after more than a year since it was published. I first read the document about 7 months ago.

The Great Barrington Declaration was authored and signed on October 4, 2020. The signers were Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. It laid out a plan for dealing with covid. If you have not read it here is a link.

From the declaration,

“Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.”

We have seen all of these prediction come to pass. The working class and younger people we know are less prone to a harmful covid disease because of their age. However, they are the most affected by the massive shutdown of the economic drivers of our society. Service industries, food preparation, delivery, and transportation systems have been shut down affecting access to necessary goods to many more people. People are out of work; people are not able to get proper health care as hospitals are always waiting, waiting for the covid patients who may never arrive. So many of the deaths that had been attributed to covid were not caused by covid at all. Here is a report from England and Wales that says just 6,000 people died of covid instead of the 150,000 number reported earlier by the government.

Children have been out of school or in school wearing harmful masks and have an increasing level of mental health issues. Teacher Stacey Lance wrote,

“Our students were taught to think of their schools as hubs for infection and themselves as vectors of disease. This has fundamentally altered their understanding of themselves.”

The Declaration covered the likelihood of serious disease with this statement.

“We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.”

The Declaration continues,

“keeping these measures (containment) in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage”

We know now that the vaccine didn’t curtail government containment policies so they continued to cause untold damage.

The declaration said,

“We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine.”

We will never know what the overall effect of vaccines but now we know that they likely had little beneficial effects. James Stanbury talks about their “negative efficacy” and that,

“While you may get a benefit for earlier variants (from vaccines), the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In short, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, but at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else.”

The Barrington declaration is correct in saying that health stability and immunity is not dependent on a vaccine.

It goes on to declare,

“The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk.”

We know that those who are not vulnerable recover quickly from covid and if they have not been vaccinated their immunity is better. If we had put most of our care and energy into protecting the vulnerable and not wasted so much money, energy and professional time and worry on the masses, then the vulnerable would have been better served. It is difficult to find information on Intensive care units filling up and overflowing. I have only heard of a few. I know in Canada the province of Saskatchewan did have an overflow in their ICU. They are a province of a million people and have only 79 ICU beds. I don’t think it is just covid that is causing trouble in our hospitals. I have been to the emergency ward of my hospital a number of times prior to covid where there had been 7 or 8 patients in beds or chairs in the hallway.

We also know now that if other low cost treatments, like ivermectin, had been used that hospitalizations would have been much less. Stephanie Brail found information about ivermectin use in India. India has had many fewer deaths that the first world countries.

The Barrington Declaration goes on to talk about ways to protect the vulnerable; one way is to use staff that has acquired immunity. As we know much of the North American way is to fire the unvaccinated workers, even though they are the ones who could naturally became immune with covid recovery.

The Declaration states that life should not have changed for those who are not vulnerable. If they are sick they stay home. Everything stays open; all business can continue to operate. People can work from home but non-risk people should continue to go to work. This is a wise, prudent, rational, and loving approach, an approach that wouldn’t have fear mongering attached to it, and it wouldn’t have sparked the terrible way the unvaccinated have been treated.

One thing I greatly admire Barrington approach is shown with this statement,

“People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.”

The vulnerable may participate it they wish. They can decide for themselves whether to see their families and friends or not. They will not be at the mercy of the state deciding for them what the state thinks I the best course.

I don’t see anything in The Great Barrington Declaration that doesn’t hit the bull’s eye.

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022Liked by Stephanie B. Natural

Pre-"covid" I used to avoid people I heard coughing. Now, I almost want to go up and give them a hug. Especially if they aren't wearing a face diaper. I was taught very early in my life that we had to be exposed to "germs" to stay healthy. And 60 years later and vaccine and prescription drug free... I say, Thanks Mom!

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2022Liked by Stephanie B. Natural

I read the Julius article a couple of months back. Most excellent and well worth anyone's time to read.

The CoVax shots were never about eradicating or controlling a virus. The real reason for this scamdemic was that the public health agencies (NIH, CDC, etc.) in conjunction with the Big Pharma companies were looking for a way to test their new mRNA technology and Covid happened along at the right time.

mRNA is cheaper, easier and faster to brew up for different types of infections or variants, such as the flu. Their "leaky" mRNA shots don't actually kill the invading virus, just weaken it. This allows it to continue to mutate, thus creating regular new variants that will then require additional shots on a regular, recurring basis, which would provide a guaranteed income stream to all concerned. All that would be necessary is to keep the population sufficiently fearful, allowing the politicians to issue shot mandates with impunity.

This is just a brief sketch of the big picture so anyone who wants, feel free to run with and expand on this.

Expand full comment

Please have a look at the value of Vitamin-D3 in the improvement of our immune system.

Cheap, safe, effective and natural. Cost of Cholecalciferol (Vitamin-D3) in reasonable doses (250ug=10'000IU daily) at wholesale prices is under US$/person/YEAR (wholesale price from China is US$7000/kg).

cholecalciferol.miraheze . org/wiki/DOI

vdmeta . com

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021·edited Dec 24, 2021Liked by Stephanie B. Natural

One other point I would like to mention about eradicating a virus. I learned in junior high school, when forced to take biology, that eradicating a virus is impossible when that virus is shared with the animal kingdom. This kingdom is the breeding ground for new strains, hence the bird, swine, and other animal names for flu's

Expand full comment

So, the only virus we supposedly got rid of thru vac is smallpox. I have heard that it is not possible to get rid of viruses that are transmitted in animals

I agree the lockdown IsoLa from an interventionist perspective only strengthened those things we were supposed to be scared of. Now I am really scared, but not by the viruses.

I am most scared of the Affluent Arrogant. The Arrogance of the Affluent may yet be the true disaster that has yet to be halted, with ever diminishing returns that wreak further destruction

Every time something comes forward suggesting the failure of their IsoLa policies, they merely tighten their vice grips...my balls are being broken, fellars

Let's get a grip and relax the fear campaign, let us live again, those of us left who are still human...members of womanity are the meek and modest free thinkers may we rise up strong

Blessings

Expand full comment
Nov 21, 2021Liked by Stephanie B. Natural

Plan? There is no Covid - the plan was to crate Hysteria and get the public to demand a vaccine for self euthanizations. That is why no report on exactly what the Vaccine is effective for will be forthcoming until 50 years of now. The FDA is "All In" with Bill Gates on forcibly reducing the worlds population by two thirds via vaccines

Expand full comment