Peer-Reviewed Paper: Yes, There Are Nanostructures Formed by mRNA Vaccines!
Dr. John Campbell explains...
I’ll admit, I was skeptical of the “covid vaccines nanobots” story from the get-go, and frankly, it was so far out there, that I didn’t think it was helpful to push it at first. It would just make the average person think you were cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs. We have plenty of terrible, “mundane” side effects of mRNA vaccines to worry about, much less nanostructures.
But we now have a peer-reviewed paper, and Dr. John Campbell has explained it in an incredulous video. The transcript and his notes are below.
I will note that just because these nanostructures were formed, it does not mean that they are 5G receivers or implanted to make people turn into zombies. Please, let’s be judicious in how we share this news with skeptical friends and family.
TDLR: The video discusses recent findings from scientists in Japan and South Korea regarding COVID-19 vaccines, particularly mRNA vaccines like Pfizer. Researchers cultured and incubated COVID-19 vaccines to replicate human body conditions. They discovered the presence of nanostructures that spontaneously assembled during the incubation process. The primary tools used for observation were stereo microscopes, which allow for 3D visualization of specimens. Images from the research showed structures ranging from 1 micrometer (size of a bacterial cell) to 100 micrometers.
Transcript
Warm welcome! Talk, it's Friday, the 6th of September. I’ve heard about phenomena years ago, of course, but got evidence to support a report on it from peer-reviewed literature. It's scientists based in Japan and South Korea. What they've done is they’ve taken COVID vaccines, mostly Pfizer mRNA, and cultured/incubated them to try and duplicate conditions in the human body. They found that nano structures have developed.
I don’t expect you’re going to watch this video or be allowed to watch it; I'm going anyway. There’s some chance to actually get to see it; that’s brilliant. Here’s the equipment they actually used here: stereo microscopes. Basically, all means looking with two eyes; therefore, you get stereoscopic vision. What happened is that initially developed two-dimensional nano structures became three-dimensional. Well, of course, you see the stereoscopic microscope.
Let’s go look at the equipment they’re using. Of course, these days, we know much; look, the microscope goes to a screen, so you can take copies from publications of some of the nano structures observed. I’ve said that conditions were designed to duplicate human cells in the human body that developed COVID vaccines, mRNA vaccines now.
We’ll just show a couple of pictures and we’ll look at the scale of the sort of structures found. I mean, heck, know that structure that spontaneously put itself together, spontaneous assembly? This structure from the COVID vaccine cultures is at a scale of 10 micrometers. One micrometer would be the size of a bacterial cell; seven micrometers would be the size of a red blood cell. You can see nano structures, but this detailed-looking structure spontaneously assembled is really quite—yeah, well look, we know that it spontaneously assembled itself.
What the heck? Of course, always, I wouldn’t give full answers to these questions; read the paper yourself. But it means the presence of nano structures needs to be explained to manufacturers, international authorizing agencies, and national authorizing agencies around the world. Peer-reviewed publication, I believe, gives questions to be answered. Even if it’s load rubbish, it still needs to be answered.
Let’s look at a couple of pictures before we look at text. Some spiral ones seem to come up again spontaneously and put themselves together spontaneously. Another spiral—um, another one there. I don’t like the idea of spontaneously forming in the body; if that's indeed the case, I don’t like the idea of that being 10 micrometers. That’s actually pretty big; that’s a scale of 10 micrometers—um, the whole thing is actually quite large, relatively speaking.
Is that spontaneously formed structure? Well, one anyway; lots more examples in the paper. Look at it; check that the paper pictures are all—um, I say I don’t think many people are going to watch this video. I’m not optimistic about getting wide distribution, shall I say? But never mind, we’re going anyway.
Um, real-time self-assembly—self-assembly things bolting themselves together under stereoscopic microscope visibility. See the stereomicroscope? Um, specimens of mRNA products, mainly Pfizer mRNA—a comprehensive longitudinal study. So construction—constructions in incubated specimens of mRNA products—our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in injectables.
I know I’m—um, I know it sounds pretty interesting material. I’m being careful not to go outside what the article is saying—the peer-reviewed article saying—and of course, I’ll give full references for everything. Um, so I’m careful with this video not to go outside what’s observable—observable real-time injuries at cellular level in recipients—safe and effective COVID injectables documented here for the first time.
Hence the fact that we’re—I think a paper just came out days ago—last week maybe—a presentation—a comprehensive description and analysis of observed phenomena needs to be explained. The global administration of these often mandated products since late 2020 triggered a plethora of independent research studies that weren’t nationally sponsored or industry-sponsored research studies—it was independent scientists.
I’ve talked to several other independent scientists who’ve come up with similar findings. I can’t talk about it; it’s not published in peer-reviewed literature. We’re going to stick with what is peer-reviewed literature—of modified RNA injectables. Of course, they’re injecting genetic material instructing the body to make foreign proteins—not injecting protein directly—most noticeably manufactured Pfizer and Moderna.
This paper—the analysis report—analyses reported here consists of precise laboratory bench science aiming to understand why serious debilitating prolonged injuries and many side particular adverse reactions occurred increasingly without measurable protective effect.
The contents of the COVID-19 injectables were examined under a stereo microscope at 400 times magnification—carefully preserved specimens cultured over a range of distinct media—to observe immediate and long-term cause-effect relationships between injectables and living cells under carefully controlled conditions.
In other words, I’m not saying these scientists succeeded, but what they’re trying to do is duplicate living conditions in laboratory bench could look under these microscopes attempting to duplicate physiological conditions in the human body.
To a degree, I’m not really able to adjudicate if they did their best; this needs duplication around the world and needs explanation. I mean, look at these things—I mean it’s—yeah—an explanation clearly required. I would thought—let you know what you think anyway.
Let’s carry carefully controlled conditions from research; reasonable inferences can be drawn from observed injuries. They’re saying it’s reasonable—the researchers are saying it’s reasonable—to make inferences from what they’re seeing in the laboratory to what’s happening in the body because they’re trying to duplicate conditions in the body.
Of course, this study was done in the body; well this great trigger for future research done by authorized institutions around the world and regulatory bodies around the world should be done to explain—don't hold your breath! Right?
Research reasonable influences drawn about observed injuries worldwide that have occurred since injectables were pressed upon billions of individuals. So they’re saying basically what they’re saying—I think a pathophysiological mechanism could explain adverse reactions—the adverse reactions are tragically seen.
Of course we’ve interviewed quite a few people on this channel who suffered this as well—in addition to cellular toxicity if it wasn’t bad enough—the findings reveal numerous on the order of three—that’s between—that’s 10^6—that's three to four million artifacts per milliliter of injectable.
Heck—that's four—four one two three one two three—up to four million three and four million visible artifacts—self-assembling entities—self-assembling entities ranging from 1 micrometer to 100 micrometers (100 microns) greater; many different shapes said one micrometer is about the size of a bacterial cell.
If you’ve got good young eyes you could probably see an object 100 micrometers—it’s 10^-10 millimeter isn’t it? Naked eye at push I probably couldn’t at my age—but maybe with glasses anyway—the researchers go on animated-like entities: chains spirals tubes right-angled structures containing artifact artifactual entities within them—artifacts within artifacts exceedingly beyond expected acceptable level of contamination in COVID-19 injectables: thought three-four million per milliliter!
The scale indeed an incubation study revealed progressive self-assembly—self-assembly of many artifactual structures over time progressed during incubation. Simple one or two-dimensional structures over two to three weeks became complex shape and size developing stereoscopically visible entities—which became three-dimensional structures incubated cultures designed replicate conditions inside human body.
Um resembled carbon nanotube filaments ribbons tapes—some appeared transparent thin flat membranes; others as three-dimensional spiral beaded chains seemed to appear then disappear over time observations suggest presence kind of nanotechnology in COVID-19 injectables directly from peer-reviewed literature.
Um I don’t expect you’ll see—I suspect strongly I’m currently talking in a back room somewhere—you can think—as a bonus you can think—I’ll give you references for this—the journal: International Journal of Vaccine Theory Practice Research.
The International Journal of Theory Practice Research—a peer-reviewed scholarly open-access journal concerning development distribution monitoring vaccines and components; content is freely available without charge to user institutions.
Of course excellent users may read download copy distribute print search or link full text articles use them for lawful purpose permission not required—the publisher nor author gives full credit of course—isn’t this refreshing?
It’s our work we’re reporting; it's free! It’s public domain—it is anti-antithesis to control agendas often we’ve seen with people not wanting release papers for decades; research has been done refreshing about the journal.
Um actual article itself—I oh got—that’s—that’s journal—you can download full journal quite—you know excellent—that's paper—that's the journal! I’ve downloaded PDF of course and that’s attribution non-commercial non-directive deed—I quite fully understand it—it’s great!
It’s basically—you are free share—it’s um—it’s course give full credit authors—I will do now um authors physician Dr. Young M. Lee uh Republic Korea and uh Professor B.R. Brow at Christian University Japan.
Of course links always there to check what we’ve done report peer-reviewed paper—it’s scientific literature as we’ve completely demonstrated in this video—I’m sorry um—I suspect that not many will get watch this video—gou—you know isn’t transparency refreshing?
Really refreshing! See that work? Look! Share it! Agree? Disagree? Do further work! Prove work! To say it’s load rubbish—it’s there open public peer analysis! Brilliant antithesis much of the more commercial research in past years and decades!
Look at paper for yourself; let me know what you think if any actually gets to see it! Bye! Hope I’m not talking to myself but thank you for watching somehow!
Notes
Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/102
Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 injectables.
International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/index
Full version of the journal
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Injuries, Causes, and Treatments, Part 2
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/issue/view/6
Creative Commons link
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Observable real-time injuries at the cellular level in recipients of the “safe and effective” COVID-19 injectables are documented here for the first time,
with the presentation of a comprehensive description and analysis of observed phenomena.
The global administration of these often-mandated products from late 2020 triggered a plethora of independent research studies of the modified RNA injectable gene therapies,
most notably those manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna.
Analyses reported here consist of precise laboratory “bench science” aiming to understand why serious debilitating, prolonged injuries (and many deaths) occurred increasingly without any measurable protective effect
The contents of COVID-19 injectables were examined under a stereomicroscope at up to 400X magnification.
Carefully preserved specimens were cultured in a range of distinct media to observe immediate and long-term cause-and-effect relationships between the injectables and living cells under carefully controlled conditions.
From such research, reasonable inferences can be drawn about observed injuries worldwide that have occurred since the injectables were pressed upon billions of individuals.
In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous — on the order of 3~4 x 106 per milliliter of the injectable
— visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1 to 100 µm, or greater, of many different shapes.
There were animated worm-like entities,
discs, chains, spirals, tubes,
right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them
All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables,
and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures.
As time progressed during incubation, simple one- and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions.
They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes,
some appearing as transparent, thin, flat membranes,
and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains.
Some of these seemed to appear and then disappear over time.
Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 injectables.
Dr. Young Mi Lee,
Jeju, Jejudo, 63098, Republic of Korea (South Korea)
Professor Daniel Broudy, Okinawa Christian University, Japan
Dear Stephanie,
as a vax injured person, I'm relieved that you finally accepted the truth.
I'm also forever grateful that you even dedicated a whole post about potential censorship on substack once my channel got shadow banned last lear.
Keep on doing your splendid research.
Btw. as expected the video got taken down on YouTube. I assume he was pressured to deleted otherwise John might have lost his whole channel.
Here's a reupload on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5e24dw--0765-dr-john-campbell-official-confirming.html
Holy Cow!
I guess my first question would be what is more harmful, gene therapy or self-assembling nanostructures? Unfortunately, most people still aren't even aware that these vaccines operate by mRNA or how it differs from old school vaxxes. Now this? It's like we're in a reality where every conspiracy theory eventually becomes true.