BOMBSHELL: SMOKING GUN? Massive Increase in Unclassified Deaths Reported by CDC
BOMBSHELL: SMOKING GUN? Massive Increase in Unclassified Deaths Reported by CDC
And a debunking of the VAERS death data denial
Americans are apparently dying of mysterious causes, and the rates have increased in recent months.
Here’s how I found out.
I was doing some research with the intention to debunk the VAERS denialists.
You know, the people who claim that all of the deaths associated with mRNA vaccines in VAERS don’t mean anything because they “changed the reporting requirements” due to the EUA. These same people insinuate that doctors are now required to report all deaths, even those not potentially associated with vaccination.
This is their lame explanation as to why the VAERS death counts have skyrocketed for Moderna and Pfizer in particular.
But this is easily debunked.
I figured, if doctors really were under threat of law to report all deaths, wouldn’t the VAERS mortality numbers be a lot higher? Because as of November 26, 2021, we’re at a total of 19,532 deaths after covid vaccination in the US. (The total number of deaths in VAERS across something like 30 years of reporting is 28,689).
Well, almost 20,000 deaths seems like a hell of a lot, and it certainly is if they are being caused by specific vaccines.
But in the United States, a rough average of 250,000 people die monthly in the United States of natural causes, and that includes deaths before covid really got rolling. I found this in a CDC database, Monthly Provisional Deaths by Select Causes, 2020-2021.
Thus, if the VAERS reports were simply reporting “all deaths” and not those possibly related to the vaccine, then we’d be seeing millions of deaths in VAERS. Like, 2,750,000 or something like that.
Clearly, we’re not.
So it stands to reason that either a) doctors aren’t reporting to VAERS what they are required to
, which means the data is vastly underreported and/or b) we really do have a high number of potential vaccine deaths that really should be investigated.But that’s not the BIG SURPRISE I found.
Look at What the CDC Database Reveals
While I was perusing the CDC provisional deaths database, I perused the various columns to see if I could find any potential patterns that might correlate with possible vaccine deaths. I didn’t notice anything hugely different under cardiac events or other named diseases.
However...the database has a category based on an ICD code: Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified (R00-R99)
This is “we don’t know how else to classify it coding.”
R00 to R99 is actually a range of codes, and they are subcategorized as follows:
ICD Code Description
R00-R09 Symptoms and signs involving the circulatory and respiratory systems
R10-R19 Symptoms and signs involving the digestive system and abdomen
R20-R23 Symptoms and signs involving the skin and subcutaneous tissue
R25-R29 Symptoms and signs involving the nervous and musculoskeletal systems
R30-R39 Symptoms and signs involving the genitourinary system
R40-R46 Symptoms and signs involving cognition, perception, emotional state and behavior
R47-R49 Symptoms and signs involving speech and voice
R50-R69 General symptoms and signs
R70-R79 Abnormal findings on examination of blood, without diagnosis
R80-R82 Abnormal findings on examination of urine, without diagnosis
R83-R89 Abnormal findings on examination of other body fluids, substances and tissues, without diagnosis
R90-R94 Abnormal findings on diagnostic imaging and in function studies, without diagnosis
R97-R97 Abnormal tumor markers
R99-R99 Ill-defined and unknown cause of mortality
The deaths listed under these codes have gone from @2,500 per month in 2020 to as of this writing:
July 2021: 5,186
August 2021: 7,631
September 2021: 10,901
October 2021: 14,295
November 2021: 12,084
Is there a perfectly good explanation for this? Partially, but not totally.
CDC Provisional Death Adjustments?
About 5 months ago, someone posted on StackExchange after noticing a spike in the provisional weekly death count:
US CDC publishes provisional counts of deaths by select causes. This year, weekly deaths associated with ICD-10 codes R00-R99 increased from approximately 600 to more than 3,000. Those codes correspond to symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified. What could be driving this increase?
The top-voted answer shared some information from the CDC that explained that provisional death counts were adjusted as more information came in. In other words, some deaths are classified as an unknown cause initially but then recategorized. Thus, you should see the numbers under “not elsewhere classified” decrease over time.
They explicitly say:
“The quarterly provisional estimates are based on data that is more incomplete for the most recent months.”
Thus, we can expect the super high numbers in October and November to drop down as time goes by.
That said, it is now December 2021, and July 2021 is still showing an unclassified death count of 5,186. This is roughly 2,000+ more than is typical, though it appears the numbers have gone up in total across 2021 vs. 2020. Here are two charts I pulled up using their visualization tool...the numbers on the bottom correlate to month:
2020 Numbers (the vertical scale on the left is numbers of deaths)
2021 Numbers (note how the scale has shifted dramatically)
As you can see, the top number in 2020 was below 3,500. But even the low months in 2021 are either at or above that number.
So let’s just say we have an extra one to two thousand unexplained deaths in the United States every month. It’s easy to blow off, but when you add it up across a year...well...might that not correlate with the almost 20,000 deaths in the VAERS database?
Some may say I’m stretching. And yes, correlation does not equal causation. But I am saying it’s super easy to downplay and hide these types of numbers.
Let’s check back in 2022 and see what the adjusted numbers look like. Remember, we can expect the super high numbers to come down, but if the total numbers are showing a monthly increase, we can certainly speculate as to what the possible cause(s) might be.
Resources:
Free Medical Qigong & Spiritual Healing weekly at LearnItLive
Holistic Health Podcast on Odysee and Rumble
Covid Vaccine Freedom Channel on Telegram
Holistic Healing Channel on Telegram
Holistic Health & Wellness Community at Locals
Uncensored Holistic Healing Community at MeWe
(BTW, I really don’t think any VAERS reporting requirements expect doctors to literally report every death under the sun. That’s just silly.)
Hi Stephanie, some news on Novavax (btw I replied to your comment regarding this on GVD's Sub, not sure you will see it so reposting here):
"The Novavax vaccine clinical trial results have been reported in three study papers, indicating some severe adverse reactions:
UK trial – systemic adverse events were much higher in the vaccine group and more than doubled following the second dose. Adverse reactions were also higher in younger age groups. There was one case of myocarditis in the vaccine group and none in the placebo, and two deaths related to COVID-19 were reported in the vaccine group compared with one in the placebo group.
South Africa trial – Medically-attended adverse events and serious adverse events occurred more often in the vaccine group than in the placebo group (13 versus six medically-attended adverse events and two versus one serious adverse events).
Animal trials in baboons and mice showed that functional antibody immunity induced by this nanoparticle vaccine and Matrix-M adjuvant depends on both the adjuvant and antigen components."
https://dailysceptic.org/2021/12/09/vaccine-safety-update-20/
Looks like yet more ineffective toxic sludge.
The data is irredeemably corrupted, both from inaccurate reporting and manipulation. Thousands of grad students are probably poring over the data right now trying to identify the true events and the obvious flaws by statistical analysis and old fashioned detective work. We'll get closer to the truth eventually, but never certain. But a little mystery in life is good for us.
It's oddly morbid that we would focus on numbers of deaths and their categories. It's interesting, but not useful for anything meaningful. Quantifying risk is fun for insurance companies and tort lawyers. Everybody else wants to know what it means for me. The interesting information
is hiding behind the numbers -- why do some people have adverse reactions, but most don't?Throughout this disaster we have been told to believe everyone has equal risk, the details don't matter. Only abject ignorance or blind terror would permit anyone to believe that.
I don't care if someone is harmed unless I know I have the same defects as the victims. Not interested in which organ or system caused their demise, only why. We're being fed unreliable numbers to distract us from the information we really need -- the "why" of the victims. We have been told very little about why some die from the virus but most don't. And were being similarly misled on the adverse reactions to the vax.
Two reasons to withhold that information -- the authors are too incompetent to understand why their patients died, or are part of an insidious coverup. Neither is acceptable in a competent society.